Freedom From The Experts

Governments educate people to only trust experts, This is so that people don't believe what they see and hear. It is a great way of transferring power to the government.

In my previous article ‘The Importance of Uncertainty’ I said, “I am no rocket scientist, but if you showed me two Rocket projects, I’d be able to evaluate them both and tell you which one was more likely to succeed. A great discernment ability means you can look at things outside of your area of expertise and trust your ability to know which is the way to go.”

What I didn’t say was, throughout my life, this skill has enabled me to be able to extract wisdom from experts and ignore their industry-accepted dogma. This skill is most unlike the vast majority of people in society. Unlike them, I have not succumbed to the plague of having to accept that everything an expert says is the equivalent of the holy grail. All simply because they passed an academic qualification and have studied the subject for years. 

My experience in production always taught me to continuously look for a better way. Often my efforts proved fruitless. Sometimes we achieved major breakthroughs which simply wouldn’t have happened if I had accepted the expert's expertise.

Another experience we all shared recently was when we saw Experts lead the world the wrong way in early 2020. This was achieved, thanks in the main to a morally bankrupt media who stifled the voices of experts who countered their insanity with logic. Though they were able to prevail for a while, the media will soon fail completely. 

I said at the time to listeners on my Rational Thinking Webcast that we would just need to wait for the world to see through this. I could say it with confidence because I understood that the truth just stands there and waits for those not wise enough to see it. I say wise because anyone who needs to have an expert’s opinion and trusts it above their own observation and discernment is not a wise person. 

I realised at the start of the insane period that I wasn’t going to find answers coming from any mainstream media source. Which meant I understood I was going to have to go and study the subject. I didn’t need to know the details, I needed to be able to listen to experts on both sides of the subject and then use my skill of discernment to be able to figure out who was more likely to be right. 

I reported what I found out back, and the Facebook herd of fearful people of course attempted to tell me that because I was not an expert in epidemiology that I was clearly an idiot. As if I couldn’t listen to multiple epidemiologists and discern which ones theories held water, and which leaked like a sieve. 

These and many other life experiences are why I have been able to spend my life proving experts in any field I chose to take an interest in to be wrong. These are fields in which I have no formal training in, yet time and time again I prove experts with decades of experience wrong.

This is one of my favourite superpowers as I get to enter ‘smug mode’ often, and anyone who knows me knows I love this sort of thing. Sad I know, but I am just a 55-year-old kid who never intends to grow up. 

Thanks to my ability to discern well, my observational skills and my ability to overcome my schooling, it means I can enter an arena with an expert and take them apart. 

I used to really enjoy doing this as I found it very funny… that doctors studied for six years and knew less about health than I did; that scientists lacked the ability to look outside of the tightly contained box their education had constructed; that accountants couldn’t find solutions to problems which they were never trained on; that economists couldn’t bring psychology into their forecasting; that psychologists could only tell people how to overcome the very same problems they had to live with themselves as they couldn’t live to what they taught.

I say all this partly to brag as this is really clever stuff and because I find it funny. But I mainly say it to point out once again that this is just a skill which can be learnt by anyone who chooses to focus on it. 

And before you say you can’t… always remember that at school I was no more than an average student, and so taking on doctors, lawyers, accountants and psychologists, and being able to take their expertise where they are right and dismiss it when they are wrong, is an ability which can be learned.  

In fact, it is an ability which needs to be relearned, as we are educated poorly to just trust experts. Whereas it is part of our nature to be able to see through dogma, bullsh*t, and poor thinking. It is an evolution skillset, so we already had it, just nearly everyone fails to deploy it enough. And never forget, whatever you don’t use, you lose… 

The skill that needs to be relearned is first-class observational skills, plus an awareness of our existing programming. 

Yes, I know you instantly know that you already have first-class observational skills. And I’m willing to concede that IF you passed the recent Covid intelligence test, and (a) never ever wore a mask, (b) nor ever took a test (let alone a PCR test), (c) instantly saw through the narrative not matching the facts, and (d) obviously did not take a vaxxxine… then the chances are you already have a pretty darn good observational skill set. Because for whatever reason in your makeup, you saw through it. ‘Saw’ being the operative word.

So this article is really just going to help you see what you did automatically and therefore probably without thought, and in doing so you may find your natural skill in one area can be transplanted into another area you may struggle with. 

Most people, however, do not have good observational skills. They may have them in some areas of their life, and not in other areas. What this is about is improving them in the important areas of life. Having great observational skills around a sport you are interested in is not an important area of life but can be very rewarding. Important areas are about making good choices ahead of time where possible. 

Most people think they have good observational skills, yet need governmental proof for them to accept something or just expert proof. Frankly, this is just being stupid, because these people failed to accept what they saw as reality and instead needed the government-sponsored media and government/pharmacutical company-sponsored experts to certify the truth. 

And for those who get triggered by my use of the descriptive word stupid - stupid means (and this is the dictionary definition here), “having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense”. I would say someone who needs governmental proof for them to accept something is showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense. Hence I use the term stupid in its place, and not as a slur.

The problem is, because people were schooled poorly and not educated, they were trained to not believe anything they see. People in all the professions above, coming out of University today, won’t believe anything they see unless they get a peer-reviewed double-blind study on it. 

This is actually good for governments as it sends power up to them. People abdicate their choices to the government thereby giving power to them in the process. Whereas, a critical / rational thinker chooses to make all their own important life choices. This is why ‘critical / rational thinking’ is not taught in schools and ‘do what we say or you’ll get punished and ostracized’ is.

Those that are schooled thus, need to disbelieve. Which means they are very poor observational scientists in their field and then in any other field too. No wonder we are seeing massive spikes in panic attacks, stress, anxiety and depression. People are constantly confused and so choose to abdicate their thinking to people who are qualified experts who then subsequently lead them up the garden path and then deny they were wrong for doing so. So confusion is increased and more need to trust experts grows in the individual’s mind.

Poor observational scholars are people who say things like, ‘well if this were true, the government would tell us or it would be in the papers.’

Whereas, I am self-educated in a myriad of subjects, and have exceptional observational and discernment skills. Which means I can look at something, sometimes only momentarily and still observe, and discern the answer which is obvious but completely invisible to someone who has been programmed to NEED authority to sign off on it. It is also invisible to someone who doubts themself thanks to their ego’s questioning of their knowledge on a subject.

If you wondered why you didn’t see through your government's experts before you did, then this is probably where your answer is hiding.

The problem is an ultimate reliance on authority and a complete lack of trust of your own ability. This leads to morons breeding morons. This is what I mean when I say, “that person is a very clever stupid person”. Or to use another of my favourite descriptive words, they are suffering from retarded thinking. 

And just for those who get triggered by the word retarded, retarded (dictionary definition again) means “less advanced in mental, physical, or social development than is usual for one's age”. I think that descriptor covers all who rely on experts instead of using their own thinking skills. They haven’t learnt to overcome their schooling, so do not engage in thinking well, but believe  they do think well. This is retarded thinking :-)  

Which means they are trapped in a situation where you cannot fix what you cannot see.

So two things here… 

Firstly, learning to see where you have been programmed to not trust yourself and only rely on experts is a crucial step to obtaining freedom from those experts. 

The first step is to accept you have been programmed and that you are unsure what this programming is and how it affects you. From there, you are able to begin to look… As you start looking, more of your hidden programming is revealed… Good luck getting it all - I am still looking for all of mine, and I have been looking a long time. The good news is, the more obvious stuff should jump out at you.

Secondly, learning to trust your own observations is of primary importance. It means you can see the truth even if the whole world tells you that you are wrong - which is exactly where I was in April 2020. 

As you follow your intuition more, thanks to observing better, or rather paying closer attention to stuff that’s going on and affecting your life, you will soon find you are proving yourself right again and again. With each occurrence you should build more confidence in your observational ability, which will provide plenty of ammunition to fight off your ego - that’s if you are still allowing the ‘inner nutter’ to talk to you of course ;-)

Trusting your own observations means you are able to withstand huge amounts of peer pressure. For example, I stood almost entirely alone in my field of personal development whilst other authors fell into line and followed the dogma, deferring to experts who led them up the garden path… Thereby failing their audience at one of the most important moments in life, and failing themselves too, which led to them taking a vaxxxine that in all likelihood has shortened their lives.

However, there is also a dark side to having what most consider an arrogant opinion on subjects, which is overconfidence in your own thinking or let’s say belligerence. This is where you are adamant you are right, so you leave no room for uncertainty. But I covered that in the last article, so won’t dwell on it again here, other than to say the space you leave for uncertainty is your insurance against belligerence. It is also insurance against being too arrogant - something I often am accused of being from people who have never read a word I’ve written.

So as long as you are okay with being proven wrong, then you are leaving space to be wrong, and thereby are open to new information even if it means you have to stand up and say “hey I got this wrong”. What’s the big deal with having to say that? The only big deal is in your own mind, fed by your ego. Being wrong is a good thing, as it means you can advance your thinking and make better calls next time… Basically, being right and being wrong are both good.

To misinformed others, you’ll likely look arrogant, and if that makes you feel uncomfortable, then bottle up your wisdom and don’t let it out. See how that works out for you instead :-) I chose, not to be that concerned about what others think, but then I am in a position that can afford that luxury.

The big important step to attaining freedom from the experts is to become comfortable questioning what you are being told, even if it comes from the highest authority, and choosing instead to trust what you observe until more data is presented to you to change your thinking. 

This is, in the main, anti-formal schooling from schools, colleges and universities. This means you can look at what were 100% truths that were accepted by all and begin to consider whether or not they may be wrong. Questioning authority is a good thing, not a bad thing - but sometimes we need to re-state the bleedin’ obvious. 

So through observation, instead of dismissing it because it doesn’t fit the industry-accepted narrative, you begin to question. The truth doesn’t mind being questioned at all, whereas dogma and lies hate it, so work to suppress alternate views and stymie their growth. 

This whole current way of academic thinking is anti-progress. Is it any wonder why I can so easily beat experts in their fields where they have spent years learning dogma which should’ve been thrown out, or at least questioned the first time someone with an observational ability pointed out it was wrong? 

When you start to look at stuff the experts accept without thought, you will discover that sometimes in as little as reading one article, you can pick holes in the arguments of people who have studied a subject their whole life.

You will of course have to endure the people in your environment who think “what the hell does he / she know? They’ve only studied it for a short time”. Remember those people have been schooled to only trust experts and have already put you in a box which doesn’t say expert on it. So when you step into new territory armed with your discernment and observational ability, you will often leave people behind, and as you do they will call you arrogant. I look at this as the price of growth, a price worth paying.

Something to look out for … When you find yourself not accepting something that has all the hallmarks of being true, or coming from someone you know is a deep thinker, then maybe it is time to pause and think. Maybe you are running on programming, and not thinking… So when you catch yourself having failed to think for yourself, ask yourself the following question and just consider it…

Why do I need the authority of an expert in this field to validate what feels right and looks right to me?…

Over the next few years, new realities are going to unfold at such a pace that, if you do not learn to rely on your observational ability, it will likely mean you fail to act when an obvious sign was presented to you. As we enter the Apocalypse, I bet you that this will potentially be extremely costly, so I recommend you devote a little more time to honing your observational skills. 

Then in seemingly no time you will discover you too will have the skills required to confound experts in their respective fields and, just like me, you’ll take their expertise onboard where valid, and dismiss their dogma efficiently.

Have fun thinking more.

Best wishes,

Andy

P.S. Don’t get distracted by the media, the real story is the Canadian bank run. Remember what I wrote previously when you put your currency in a bank, it ceases being yours, it is only yours again if the banks let you have it back :-)